In addition, multiple assessments are implemented at assessment centres, so they are also fairer, as candidates are given a number of opportunities to demonstrate their strengths. This multi-rater, multi-method is at the core of an assessment centre, and a key reason for its success.
MKBP ensure exercises/methods are bespoke to customer’s needs as evidence shows that best (and most cost effective) results are achieved when exercises are designed for a specific role with a given organisational context.
check_circle is designed using relevant job critical competencies
check_circle is rounded in exercises that are job-relevant, and ideally where most noticeable differences in performance can be observed
check_circle assessors are effectively trained
Assessment centres can be delivered in a variety of forms to suit your needs - Face to Face, Virtual or Hybrid.
Pre-screening: We can produce pre-screening reports based on relevant personality and ability tests to guide in-house interviews with candidates. These reports highlight:
The overall level of fit against role competencies
Candidate strengths against role competencies
Potential development needs against role requirements
Potential contra indicators with role requirements (higher risk areas)
Suggested follow-up interview questions
Individual Development: Feedback to guide development planning for existing jobholders.
Team Development: Feedback to guide team-building interventions.
OPQ32 | WAVE | HPI | NEOPI-R
Personality
Ability
Critical Reasoning
Verbal, Numerical & Spatial Reasoning
HDS
Leadership Risk
Motivation & Values
MVPI
Team Development
Margerson McCann Team Management
Emotional Intelligence
EQI
Pyschometric testing
We use leading personality instruments and ability tests
Our Business Psychology team can help you profile the competencies driving effective performance in key job roles, prepare role profiles and develop an organisation-wide competency framework.
Training
Our online training course focuses on ensuring assessors have the right skills to maximise consistency of evaluation and minimise subjective judgements and distortions. Improving rater reliability helps ensure well-designed selection processes get the effective results they deserve.